Uzbekistan
1994 - Uzbekistan 3 Sum banknote PIC 74 UNC
This Uzbekistan 3 Sum banknote is associated with 1994 and corresponds to the Krause catalogue type ..
1994 - Uzbekistan 5 Sum banknote PIC 75 UNC
This Uzbekistan 5 Sum banknote is associated with 1994 and is listed as PIC 75a. The note is catalog..
1994 - Uzbekistan 50 Sum banknote PIC 78 UNC
This Uzbekistan 50 Sum banknote is associated with 1994 and is catalogued as Pick P78. The front fea..
1997 - Uzbekistan 200 Sum banknote PIC 80 UNC
This individual banknote is a 200 Sum note from Uzbekistan, associated with the year 1997. The produ..
1999 - Uzbekistan 500 Sum banknote PIC 81 UNC
This individual banknote is a 500 Sum note from Uzbekistan, associated with the year 1999. The produ..
2001 - Uzbekistan 1000 Sum banknote PIC 82 UNC
This individual banknote is from Uzbekistan and has a denomination of 1000 Sum. The product is assoc..
Frequently asked questions
What periods and denominations are represented in this Uzbekistan banknote category?
This shop’s Uzbekistan catalog covers notes dated from 1992 through 2001. Represented denominations include 1, 3, 5, 10, 25, 50, 100, 200, 500 and 1,000 Sum. The selection includes groups dated 1992 and 1994, followed by higher denominations dated 1997, 1999 and 2001. It describes the shop’s catalog rather than every banknote issued by Uzbekistan.
Which catalog references appear among the Uzbekistan banknotes?
The Uzbekistan category includes references PIC 61 through PIC 65 for the 1992 notes, PIC 73 through PIC 79 for the 1994 group, and PIC 80, PIC 81 and PIC 82 for notes dated 1997, 1999 and 2001. Some model fields add suffixes, including PIC 64a, PIC 73a, PIC 74a, PIC 75a and PIC 76a.
How can I distinguish the 1992 and 1994 low-denomination Uzbekistan notes?
Start with the printed date, denomination and catalog reference. The 1, 3, 5, 10 and 25 Sum denominations appear in both dated groups, but their references differ: PIC 61–65 identify the 1992 listings, while PIC 73–77 identify the corresponding 1994 denominations. Checking all three details helps prevent confusion between notes that share the same face value.
What should collectors check when identifying versions and grades in this category?
Use the full listing information rather than denomination alone. Check the date, Sum value, PIC reference, any suffix in the model field and the stated grade. For example, the 1992 1 Sum note with PIC 61 is represented in both UNC and XF grades, while the 1992 10 Sum model is identified as PIC 64a. The catalog does not explain the technical meaning of each suffix.
What details should a buyer review before choosing an Uzbekistan banknote?
Compare the listing title and model for the date, denomination, PIC reference and grade. Most records describe their images as reference images, whereas the XF listing for the 1992 1 Sum PIC 61 states that the banknote corresponds with the image. Because image treatment differs between listings, buyers should rely on the specific product record rather than assuming one image policy applies across the category.
What denomination pattern is visible across the dated Uzbekistan listings?
The catalog shows low denominations of 1 through 25 Sum in the 1992 group. The 1994 group again begins at 1 Sum and extends through 50 and 100 Sum. Later dated listings move to 200 Sum in 1997, 500 Sum in 1999 and 1,000 Sum in 2001. This is a pattern within the shop’s represented material, not a complete chronology of Uzbekistan banknotes.